2012 Review

5 Mar


Starring: John Cusack, Woody Harrelson, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt

I wasn’t sure I was going to like this movie.  I liked the cast, but a ‘end of the world’ movie isn’t really my niche.  I did like it, but it wasn’t outstanding.

The movie is set between the years of 2008-2012.  A top geologist, played by the great Chiwetel Ejiofor, informs the government that they are heading towards the end of civilization due to scientific and climate issues taking place in the crust of the Earth.  Before you know it, the world as they know it is crumbling into dust clouds everywhere they look.

Director Roland Emmerich, disaster movie extraordinaire, has made many movies like this one.  He is responsible for films such as Independence Day and The Day After Tomorrow.  I feel that this is the weakest of the three.  I felt that disaster in this movie was too repetitive.  For the most part, nothing new was happening; it was the same effects time after time.  I wasn’t shocked by it towards the end of the film, I just expected it.

I’m torn on the casting of this movie; some choices I loved, some I hated.  I was not familiar with Ejiofor prior to this movie, but I thought he was great.  I felt more connection to his character than to Cusack’s.  Platt was scary good in this film.  I’ve seen him play a variety of characters, starting with Flatliners in the early 90’s, but this made me think of him in a new way.  He plays selfish and authoritative in such a believable way.  Harrelson was perfectly cast as the erratic, over-the-top conspiracy theorist.  He was definitely the comic relief in this film.

As for what I could have done without: Danny Glover as President.  I don’t know why, he’s a great actor, but I didn’t buy him in this role.  I love Cusack, but I don’t know that this was the right film for him.  I know that Emmerich likes to combine personal stories with the destruction, but it was just too typical I think – he misses his family, disaster strikes, they reunite.

I am by no means a special effects guru, but I just didn’t care for the effects in this movie.  Kind of like what I said earlier about everything being too predictable.  At least in Emmerich’s other two movies, there was a variety of things happening that lead to different effects.  I felt they were sort of one-note.  I’m sure I will get disagreements on this, but strictly from my viewpoint that’s how I saw it.

I would take Independence Day over this film any day of the week.  I do recommend this movie, though, as it’s still interesting to watch.  Be prepared for its running time is approximately two and a half hours.



2 Responses to “2012 Review”

  1. Castor March 6, 2010 at 4:24 pm #

    I thought 2012 was utterly laughable in a “how bad can this get” kind of way. It was so over the top I could not believe all those relatively big names would associate themselves with that movie.

    • Carrie March 6, 2010 at 5:47 pm #

      I just thought it could have been better. I was disappointed for sure, but I think disaster movies are usually hit or miss.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: