‘Sex and the City 2’ Review

30 May

Sex and the City 2

Starring: Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Catrall, Kristen Davis, Cynthia Nixon

Director: Michael Patrick King

Sometimes it’s just not necessary to make a movie.  Unfortunately, when a movie can bring in a lot of money with little story or effort, it seems like a scam.  Sex and the City 2 capitalized on its previous success, but forgot to tell a worthwhile story as well.

The last time viewers saw the four best friends from NYC, Carrie (Sarah Jessica Parker) had finally married Big (Chris Noth), Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) had patched up her marriage, Charlotte (Kristen Davis) had given birth and Samantha (Kim Catrall) had, well…returned to her single roots.  The first movie picked up right where fans of the HBO series had hoped they would. 

The second film deals with Carrie’s frustration with being a boring married couple.  After Samantha is given a free vacation in order to publicize a middle eastern resort, the girls pack up and leave for Abu Dhabi.  Samantha is going through menopause and is trying everything she can think of to postpone the inevitable.  Charlotte is struggling as a mother of two young children and is embarrassed to talk about it with her friends.  Miranda is at a career crossroads as she quits her job in search of a place where she will both feel fulfilled and appreciated.

While on vacation in the desert, Carrie runs into ex-fiance Aiden.  Surprised by the run-in, Carrie agrees to go to dinner with him and must toe the line if she wants to get back to Mr. Big in NYC.  Samantha is having a hard time with her lack of sexual desires and is worried that she’ll never be the same again.  Charlotte and Miranda bond over cocktails and they come to terms with what they really want from life.

I was so disappointed with this film.  I was a huge fan of the series and really enjoyed the first film, but this sequel just missed the mark.  Taking the girls out of NYC to vacation in the middle east for 80% of this movie was not good planning.  All four of the main actresses have said time and time again that NYC is the fifth character.  So basically, director Michael Patrick King decided to lose the fifth character in exchange for a boring location shoot.

The set up for this film was all wrong in my opinion.  A wedding opens the film and lasts entirely too long and then in the blink of an eye, the girls are half way around the world.  I didn’t find much humor in this film either.  Of course there are a couple good lines scattered throughout, but overall the funny has been left back in NYC.

I did enjoy that the majority of the film was more about the four girls this time, but I think that more storyline could have been created if they weren’t in the middle of the desert.  I loved the return of John Corbett as Aiden, but after seeing his scenes, I felt sort of jipped.  It was definitely a ploy to forward the plot, but he was such a likable character and fan favorite, that I wish he would have been used in a better capacity.

I missed seeing more of Steve (David Eigenberg), Harry (Evan Handler) and Smith (Jason Lewis).  Big definitely had the biggest male role, but again, it was just boring.  Much has been made out of the fact that the ladies are aging, which trust me – they are, so it would make sense to tackle that while in the place they came of age in.  There is so much entertaining material that could be brought out of that.

Sadly, I can’t recommend this film.  This is just another example of making a movie to make a movie.  Sure, making money is what Hollywood is all about, but when all the pieces are there to have an entertaining movie and it doesn’t materialize, it’s a major let down.


5 Responses to “‘Sex and the City 2’ Review”

  1. hannahpoturalski May 30, 2010 at 11:09 pm #

    I saw SATC2 tonight and I gotta say I thoroughly enjoyed it! I was a big fan of the series and the first film. It sets out to entertain and ‘sparkle’ and that’s simply what it did. For SATC, I try not to look for too much depth, because that’s when the disappointment comes into play.

    • Carrie May 31, 2010 at 10:14 am #

      I just didn’t find it all that entertaining which was the problem. There have been a lot of mixed reviews, it’s pretty much a love it or hate it movie.

  2. hannahpoturalski May 30, 2010 at 11:08 pm #

    I saw SATC2 tonight and I gotta say I thoroughly enjoyed it! I was a big fan of the series and the first film. It sets out to entertain and ‘sparkle’ and that’s simply what it did. For SATC, I try not to look for too much depth, because that’s when the disappoint comes into play.

  3. FollowMyFilm May 30, 2010 at 11:37 am #

    Hey Carrie,

    Though I have not seen either film, I did watch the entire series religiously!!! One of the greatest series of comedic television scripts of all time (except for the final season – don’t get me going on that!).

    Okay, so my question: why theatrical movies? There is no reason other than attempting to reach a broader audience and making more money, which, IMHO, a television show does not justify…. What about Friends the movie or the Sopranos. I’m sure they thought about it, but it simply does not work….

    • Carrie May 30, 2010 at 11:59 am #

      I think the number one reason television crosses over to film is that the built-in fan base = $$$. Secondly, I do think on certain occassions that a TV show can make for an entertaining film. I think the first SATC film was appealing to fans and told a good story. Shows like Friends definitely would not transition well. Actually, now that I’m thinking about it, I think that shows that have cinematic value or properties about them are usually the ones that transition best. 24 is being made into a film and although I stopped watching the show about 3 seasons ago, I can see how that would be marketed as a high-octane action film.

      So many of the crossovers are all about marketing and PR. If you have a loyal viewership and good word-of-mouth, just about anything has the potential to be successful. Whether or not that success is based on good material is a whole other subject…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: